On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 11:20 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Really? That means we can no longer even allocate stacks for forking. I think I'm running with 4k stacks... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [00/17] [RFC] Virtual Compound Page Support
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- [00/17] [RFC] Virtual Compound Page Support
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] firewire: adopt read cycle timer ABI from raw1394
- Next by Date: Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
- Previous by thread: Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
- Next by thread: Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
- Index(es):
 |