Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK

On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 11:20 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> Really? That means we can no longer even allocate stacks for forking.

I think I'm running with 4k stacks...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [00/17] [RFC] Virtual Compound Page Support
  - From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
- [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
  - From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
- Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
  - From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
- Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
  - From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
- Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
  - From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
- Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
  - From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] firewire: adopt read cycle timer ABI from raw1394
Next by Date: Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
Previous by thread: Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
Next by thread: Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]