On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 01:31:52 -0400 Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> wrote: > doesn't Andrew have a version of these patches that move the useful > patch text into the area where it will get copied into the permanent > kernel changelog? > > also, your PHYLIB patches give no notion at all of proper patch order. > Andrew has patches coming out of his ears. umm.... Applying order: phylib-spinlock-fixes-for-softirqs.patch phylib-irq-event-workqueue-handling-fixes.patch phylib-fix-an-interrupt-loop-potential-when-halting.patch ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc8/2.6.23-rc8-mm2/broken-out/phylib-spinlock-fixes-for-softirqs.patch ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc8/2.6.23-rc8-mm2/broken-out/phylib-irq-event-workqueue-handling-fixes.patch ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.23-rc8/2.6.23-rc8-mm2/broken-out/phylib-fix-an-interrupt-loop-potential-when-halting.patch Let me unload some netdev patches at you... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] PHYLIB: Spinlock fixes for softirqs
- From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: Spinlock fixes for softirqs
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] PHYLIB: Spinlock fixes for softirqs
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: Spinlock fixes for softirqs
- Next by Date: Re: vm86.c audit_syscall_exit() call trashes registers
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: Spinlock fixes for softirqs
- Next by thread: UML dead with current -git?
- Index(es):