Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes

> And also, I wonder if at a minimum we should be guaranteeing ACPI BIOS calls
> only ever happen from CPU#0 (or the "boot" CPU)?   Or do we do that already?

The real question that matters is "does windows" which possibly someone
who touches Windows can definitively answer. For APM we lock to CPU 0 and
have to because its what MS did, not because of the spec.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes
  - From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes
  - From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/6] Filter based on a nodemask as well as a gfp_mask
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes
Next by thread: Re: [patch 0/2] suspend/resume regression fixes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]