Re: [PATCH] Generic compat_sys_fallocate

On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 07:06:10AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> 
> These are not identical... the least and most significant parts seem to get
> passed in a different way on little and big endian machines.
> Maybe it would be worth to have something like compat_merge_64() which does
> the right thing?
> 

yeah, that's what i've just done.

cheers,
	Kyle
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] Generic compat_sys_fallocate
    • From: Kyle McMartin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] Generic compat_sys_fallocate
    • From: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Generic compat_sys_fallocate
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 05/12] mm: trylock_page
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Generic compat_sys_fallocate
• Next by thread: [RFC][PATCH 1/8] get mount write in __dentry_open()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]