Re: F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC implementation

[Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Davide Libenzi wrote:
> I think new system calls would have been a cleaner way to accomplish this. 
> The "small pill at a time" may have better chance to go in, but will 
> likely result in an uglier userspace interface.

We'd need this call anyway since neither dup nor dup2 provides the
functionality of F_DUPFD (but F_DUPFD can be used to implement dup).

For dup2() I will wait until we have a sys_indirect implementation.
I'll try to get this soon.

- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG/Ua02ijCOnn/RHQRAgOQAKCfQ9H4VYau6nVGuVXyJ7IfBXK+QgCfYQxv
k4esG379v8VBceFIECDybk0=
=dvhX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/