Re: [PATCH] Module use count must be updated as bridges are created/destroyed

On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:37:39 +0800
Herbert Xu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Jan Beulich <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > So we have an unsolvable problem here then, unless infrastructure gets added
> > that allows a module to declare itself as not-implicit-unload-safe, forcing
> > modprobe -r to keep its hands off it. Ugly.
> 
> Yes I've always wanted to have a separate count that indicates
> a module is in use but does not prevent its immediate removal.
> 
> Cheers,

It is only the nested removal problem.

-- 
Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Module use count must be updated as bridges are created/destroyed
  - From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Module use count must be updated as bridges are created/destroyed
  - From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Module use count must be updated as bridges are created/destroyed
  - From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] Generic compat_sys_fallocate
Next by Date: [RFC][PATCH 2/8] move mnt_want_write() into open_namei_create()
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Module use count must be updated as bridges are created/destroyed
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Module use count must be updated as bridges are created/destroyed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]