Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL

On Thursday 20 September 2007 16:31, Andrew Morton wrote:

> I struggled for five minutes trying to work out how to make CONFIG_SYSCTL
> go away and gave up in disgust.
>
> God I hate select.

IMO a better implementation would result in a notification / confirmation of
turning on new items, and the ability to deselect options which will also
confirm to deselect dependants. Like most other systems that have similar
problem to solve.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL
    • From: Andreas Herrmann <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] disable non-boot CPUs before poweroff
• Next by Date: Re: XFS Fails Quality Assurance Tests on ARM
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] 9p: fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]