Re: [RFC] QoS params patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:40:26 -0700 Mark Gross <[email protected]> wrote:

> +#define QOS_RESERVED 0
> +#define QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY 1
> +#define QOS_NETWORK_LATENCY 2
> +#define QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT 3
> +
> +#define QOS_NUM_CLASSES 4
> +#define QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE -1
> +
> +int qos_add_requirement(int qos, char *name, s32 value);
> +int qos_update_requirement(int qos, char *name, s32 new_value);
> +void qos_remove_requirement(int qos, char *name);

It's a bit rude stealing the entire "qos" namespace like this - there are
many different forms of QoS, some already in-kernel.

s/qos/pm_qos/g ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux