RE: [ofa-general] [PATCH v3] iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts.

>It is ok to block while holding a mutex, yes?

It's okay, I just didn't try to trace through the code to see if it ever tries
to acquire the same mutex in the thread that needs to signal the event.

- Sean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH v3] iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts.
  - From: Steve Wise <[email protected]>
- Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH v3] iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts.
  - From: Sean Hefty <[email protected]>
- Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH v3] iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts.
  - From: Steve Wise <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.23-rc8-mm2: BUG near reiserfs_xattr_set
Next by Date: Re: New 'Changes-licensed-under' tag introduced for Linux-wireless
Previous by thread: Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH v3] iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts.
Next by thread: Coding FATX support for 2.6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]