Re: Man page for revised timerfd API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Michael Kerrisk wrote:

> Davide,
> 
> A further question: what is the expected behavior in the
> following scenario:
> 
> 1. Create a timerfd and arm it.
> 2. Wait until M timer expirations have occurred
> 3. Modify the settings of the timer
> 4. Wait for N further timer expirations have occurred
> 5. read() from the timerfd
> 
> Does the buffer returned by the read() contain the value
> N or (M+N)?  In other words, should modifying the timer
> settings reset the expiration count to zero?

Every timerfd_settime() zeroes the tick counter. So in your scenario it'll 
return N.



- Davide


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux