On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:40:07 +0200,
Pierre-Yves Paulus <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >> Yet another report, once again while putting rfcomm system under load.
> >> Several USB adapters, several links.
> >
> > Is this a regression or does it happen with 2.6.22 too?
>
> I've not tested with 2.6.22, but have done it a few days ago with
> 2.6.21-2-486 (stock debian package), and got the 2 Oops below. Maybe
> that's a different problem, or maybe not?
>
>
> kobject_add failed for rfcomm1 with -EEXIST, don't try to register
> things with the same name in the same directory.
There's something wrong with rfcomm trying to create objects with
duplicate names...
> [<c01babdc>] kobject_shadow_add+0x13b/0x16d
> [<c01bad94>] kobject_set_name+0x2b/0x92
> [<c0217128>] device_add+0xab/0x5fb
> [<c01ba8ad>] kobject_get+0xf/0x13
> [<c0217b84>] device_create+0x77/0x97
> [<c0201632>] tty_register_device+0xb5/0xbd
> [<c01bd839>] vsnprintf+0x44f/0x48b
> [<d02df627>] rfcomm_dev_ioctl+0x212/0x48f [rfcomm]
> [<d00495b3>] dl_done_list+0x117/0x1a6 [ohci_hcd]
> [<d02de21c>] rfcomm_sock_ioctl+0x1e/0x2d [rfcomm]
> [<c0235739>] sock_ioctl+0x19f/0x1be
> [<c02358ab>] sys_getsockopt+0x60/0x9c
> [<c023559a>] sock_ioctl+0x0/0x1be
> [<c015dfc1>] do_ioctl+0x19/0x4c
> [<c015e1f3>] vfs_ioctl+0x1ff/0x216
> [<c015e256>] sys_ioctl+0x4c/0x66
> [<c0103b90>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> =======================
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
> 0000006f
> printing eip:
> c01bb361
> *pde = 00000000
> Oops: 0000 [#1]
> Modules linked in: rfcomm l2cap button ac battery ipv6 dm_snapshot
> dm_mirror dm_mod softdog loop parport_pc parport snd_cs5535audio hci_usb
> bluetooth floppy snd_ac97_codec rtc ac97_bus pcspkr psmouse serio_raw
> snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc geode_rng geode_aes
> blkcipher tsdev evdev usbhid hid reiserfs ide_disk generic ohci_hcd
> usbcore amd74xx ide_core ata_generic 8139cp 8139too mii sata_via libata
> scsi_mod thermal processor fan
> CPU: 0
> EIP: 0060:[<c01bb361>] Not tainted VLI
> EFLAGS: 00010286 (2.6.21-2-486 #1)
> EIP is at kref_get+0x6/0x3d
> eax: 0000006f ebx: 0000006f ecx: c4b94ad4 edx: 00000000
> esi: c5c5cc00 edi: cef74c00 ebp: ffffffea esp: c5783e50
> ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 00d8 gs: 0033 ss: 0068
> Process hcid (pid: 13094, ti=c5782000 task=ca09e5a0 task.ti=c5782000)
> Stack: c4b94ac8 00000000 00000286 c7c7eca0 00000057 c01ba8ad c5c5ccb8
> c0216bb4
> c0216bcd 00000000 c4b94aa0 c5c5cc00 cef74c00 cef74cf8 d02dfa60
> 00000009
> 00000000 cef74cf8 00000000 ca09e5a0 c01157a6 00100100 00200200
> 00000100
> Call Trace:
> [<c01ba8ad>] kobject_get+0xf/0x13
> [<c0216bb4>] get_device+0xe/0x14
> [<c0216bcd>] device_move+0x13/0xe2
> [<d02dfa60>] rfcomm_tty_open+0x17d/0x189 [rfcomm]
> [<c01157a6>] default_wake_function+0x0/0xc
> [<c02034c9>] tty_open+0x167/0x29b
> [<c0156b8e>] chrdev_open+0xc5/0xea
> [<c015d345>] open_namei+0x257/0x543
> [<c0156ac9>] chrdev_open+0x0/0xea
> [<c0153801>] __dentry_open+0xb7/0x16d
> [<c0153931>] nameidata_to_filp+0x24/0x33
> [<c0153977>] do_filp_open+0x37/0x3e
> [<c01539c4>] do_sys_open+0x46/0xcd
> [<c0153a84>] sys_open+0x1c/0x1e
> [<c0103b90>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> =======================
> Code: cc d3 f5 ff e8 58 a3 f4 ff ff 0b 0f 94 c0 31 d2 84 c0 74 09 89 d8
> ff d6 ba 01 00 00 00 83 c4 10 89 d0 5b 5e c3 53 89 c3 83 ec 10 <83> 38
> 00 75 29 c7 44 24 0c b9 09 2a c0 c7 44 24 08 20 00 00 00
> EIP: [<c01bb361>] kref_get+0x6/0x3d SS:ESP 0068:c5783e50
...which may very well lead to this bug if it ignored the error from
the failing device_create() above. But I'm not familiar with the rfcomm
code, sorry.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
