On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 09:11:26PM -0700, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> David Howells wrote:
> > Move the effective capabilities mask from the task struct into the credentials
> > record.
> >
> > Note that the effective capabilities mask in the cred struct shadows that in
> > the task_struct because a thread can have its capabilities masks changed by
> > another thread. The shadowing is performed by update_current_cred() which is
> > invoked on entry to any system call that might need it.
>
> OOC If we were to simply drop support for one process changing the
> capabilities of another, would we need this patch?
Umm... It would become simpler (which is a damn good thing - less PITA
with update_current_cred), but it would be still needed.
FWIW, dropping that support would be a Good Thing(tm), as far as I'm
concerned. _Why_ do we want that, anyway, and how much userland code
is able to cope with that in sane way?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
