On lunedì 24 settembre 2007, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 05:57:49PM +0200, Paolo Giarrusso wrote: > > Yes, indeed - or sign extension on 64bit machines would set to 1 the > > whole high-word. > > > > But using long for that mask makes no difference; either int or long > > long (or better, either u32 or u64) should be used, given that the > > used signal range is the same on 32 and 64bit machines, it should > > be u32 for normal signals or u64 if RT-signals are also allowed. > > We don't use RT signals for anything, so we could use u32. I wasn't sure of that. > I don't > see it making much difference though. Agreed - the only difference is for cleanliness and easy verification. -- "Doh!" (cit.), I've made another mistake! Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- References:
- [PATCH] UML - Fix irqstack crash
- From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
- Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML - Fix irqstack crash
- From: Paolo Giarrusso <[email protected]>
- Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML - Fix irqstack crash
- From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] UML - Fix irqstack crash
- Prev by Date: Re: Regression in 2.6.23-pre Was: Problems with 2.6.23-rc6 on AMD Geode LX800
- Next by Date: Re: ACPI power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7)
- Previous by thread: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML - Fix irqstack crash
- Next by thread: Bogus high interrupt load?
- Index(es):