Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote on 25.09.2007 16:29:51:
> The description makes it sound like a git-bisect would get broken
> by this patch, which should never happen. If the patch indeed
> ends up with a broken kernel, it would be better to merge it with
> the later patch that fixes the code again.
I took extra care to prevent just that from happening. ibmebus will simply
be disabled during the transition (because of {un,}register_driver being
empty dummies), but the kernel builds and boots without problems. So
unless you're trying to find an ibmebus-based problem, git bisect will be
fine. I'll repost 2/5 with an updated description.
I split the ibmebus rework into three patches because the merged patch was
impossible to read. Makes reviewing easier.
Joachim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
