On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 08:32 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >ioremap_nocache() does __ioremap(..., _PAGE_PCD);, then __ioremap() does
> >ioremap_page_range(..., _PAGE_PCD | other_stuff) That's one.
> >
> >__ioremap() then does ioremap_change_attr(..., _PAGE_PCD);. That's two.
> >
> >So I _think_ we're setting _PAGE_PCD twice on those pte's? Unclear. The
> >implementation is rather different from i386, too.
> >
> >I dunno why __change_page_attr() failed though. Perhaps this, in
> >change_page_attr_addr():
> >
> > if (!kernel_map || pte_present(pfn_pte(0, prot))) {
> >
> >should be &&
>
> Definitely not, and this code has been that way for a while.
>
> I rather suspect this change
>
> - if (!kpte) return 0;
> + if (!kpte)
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> to be the reason for the failure (and I had already sent a comment to this
> respect to Andi upon his review request).
This change exposes the problem. The question is why we do not have a
page table entry for the address, which was mapped right before that.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
