Re: ACPI power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:51:09 +0200 Damien Wyart <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> After testing rc8, I noticed that I couldn't power off the computer
> directly, it only got halted and I had to press the power button
> manually. Just before displaying "System halted", the following message
> is displayed:
> 
>   ACPI : PCI interrupt for device 0000:02:08.0 disabled
> 
> I had to first revert 5a50fe709d527f31169263e36601dd83446d5744 then
> f216cc3748a3a22c2b99390fddcdafa0583791a2 (handling of Sx states) to
> recover previous behaviour.

Hmm. Those things *do* seem to be suspicious.

For example, those commits seem to move code that used to be inside 
CONFIG_PM (which pretty much *everybody* has) to be inside 
CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP (which is a totally different thing, and depends on 
whether the user asked for suspend support or not!

Damien - does it work if you ask for SUSPEND or HIBERNATION support?

Len - why are you guys moving stuff into CONFIG_PM_SLEEP? I know you seem 
to think that absolutely *everybody* should always support suspend and 
hibernation, but the fact is, not everybody does. And it's a totally 
separate thing for normal ACPI CPU runstate support that people have used 
to manage a *running* CPU (and shutting it down).

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux