> Will test this evening the patch you pointed in your next message. Ok, with both patches (including the very latest one from Alexey --- tried the "stylistically correct" one), machine halts fine again. Thanks to all for having looked at this! -- Damien Wyart - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ACPI power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7)
- From: Mike Houston <mikeserv@bmts.com>
- Re: ACPI power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7)
- References:
- ACPI power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7)
- From: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@free.fr>
- Re: ACPI power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7)
- From: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@free.fr>
- Re: ACPI power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7)
- From: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@free.fr>
- Re: ACPI power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
- Re: ACPI power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7)
- From: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@free.fr>
- ACPI power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7)
- Prev by Date: Re: s2ram + usb
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] module: implement module_inhibit_unload()
- Previous by thread: Re: ACPI power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7)
- Next by thread: Re: ACPI power off regression in 2.6.23-rc8 (NOT in rc7)
- Index(es):
![]() |