On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 23:17 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> It look like a false positive to me, but really, for a patchset of this
> complexity and maturity I cannot fathom how it could have escaped any
> lockdep testing.
I test with lockdep all the time. The problem was that lockdep doesn't
complain until you have 8 nested locks, and I only tested on a 4-cpu
system.
I lowered the lockdep nesting limit to 3, and got the warning on my
machine.
-- Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
