Re: [patch 4/7] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code

On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 02:15:12PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> > static inline void __mark_check_format(const char *fmt, ...)
> > 		__attribute__ ((format (printf, 1, 2)))
> > {
> > }
> 
> the header file compiler-gcc.h defines the shorter macro "__printf".
> is it worth encouraging its use, or does it matter?

Yes, that's even better.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 4/7] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 0/7] Linux Kernel Markers (redux)
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
  • [patch 4/7] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 4/7] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
    • From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 4/7] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
    • From: "Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 6/7] Linux Kernel Markers - Documentation
• Next by Date: Re: bug in fsck or ext2/ext3?
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 4/7] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 4/7] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]