Re: [PATCH 3/5] Cleanup code under CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED

On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 09:53:44AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >  config FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> > -	bool "Fair group scheduler"
> > -	depends on EXPERIMENTAL && CONTAINERS
> > +	bool "Fair group cpu scheduler"
> 
> Can we have "CPU" instead of "cpu" ?

Sounds good. Will add to my follow-on.patch (and will send out after
others have had a chance to comment).

-- 
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 0/5] Fair group scheduler - various fixes
  - From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 3/5] Cleanup code under CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
  - From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] Cleanup code under CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
  - From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.22.6 user-mode linux: use address instead of value as argument in os_free_irq_by_cb
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Remove broken netfilter binary sysctls from bridging code
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/5] Cleanup code under CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
Next by thread: [PATCH 4/5] Add fair-user scheduler
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]