On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 11:22 +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> Together with the idea of not allowing multiple lines in the kprint_xxx
> functions, that would go with our approach having message numbers to
> identify a message.
How does this equate/give message numbers?
> If you do it like that, you can't support "%s", since then you would
> store only the pointer and not the whole string. I think, that we can't
> live without %s.
long long would not work either.
Perhaps it's better to scan the format string or indirect the
printk formatting logic.
Another possibility:
An added pass between gcc preprocessor and compiler could compact
or compress the format string without modifying the conversion
specifications so __attribute__ ((format (printf)) would still work.
printk could expand the compacted/compressed format.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
