* Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:27:07 -0400 (EDT)
> Extend the memparse() routine to allow a caller to use NULL as the
> second parameter value if he has no interest in that returned value.
(not `he', but `it', even if `he', then better `callers' + `they')
> ---
>
> there appear to be quite a number of calls to "memparse" which have
> no use for the value returned in the second parameter (the current
> pointer after the successful parse), but which are still forced to
> supply a valid char** address since they have no choice but to accept
> that value coming back. in many cases, that value is accepted just
> before the end of the calling function, making it clear that the value
> is ignored entirely, anyway.
A posteriori value, stored in this pointer serves very important role: it
validates returned result. Caller must do this. But if programmer doesn't
know problems (see below), `must' melts down to `may'.
If you take a look at simple_strtoull(), it already doesn't care if this
pointer is NULL or not. (So patch is NULL :)
But take closer look. If it returns `0' (zero), it is not clear if this
zero was parsed or not, unless you can compare `ptr' and `retptr'.
Another case if entire string have no valid number to parse (see
strtol(3)).
This is problem of this particular function, that is copied form
ordinary C. For instance see <http://bugs.debian.org/431320>.
--
-o--=O`C
#oo'L O
<___=E M
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
