On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 14:07 -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>
> > So I'm inclined to implement option (b), unless someone has strong
> > objections. Davide, could I persuade you to help?
>
> I guess I better do, otherwise you'll continue to stress me ;)
>
> int timerfd_create(int clockid);
> int timerfd_settime(int ufd, int flags,
> const struct itimerspec *utmr,
> struct itimerspec *otmr);
> int timerfd_gettime(int ufd, struct itimerspec *otmr);
>
> Patch below. Builds, not tested yet (you need to remove the "broken"
> status from CONFIG_TIMERFD in case you want to test - and plug the new
> syscall to arch/xxx).
> May that work for you?
> Thomas-san, hrtimer_try_to_cancel() does not touch ->expires and I assume
> it'll never do, granted?
Davide-san, I have no intention to change that, but remember there is
this file "Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt" :)
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
