On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 12:18 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> I think you misread my comment. Those requests are **NOT** pending!!
> So this update has a *MORE* incorrect description of the issue.
>
> That's just the freelist ... it's a fairly conventional model whereby
> there's a pool of "free" request slots which can be issued. When the
> pool empties, the TX queue shuts down until one of the requests which
> is pending in the hardware completes, and makes a slot free.
>
> The problem you're addressing is that there's a small window where a
> disconnect IRQ can shut down the TX queue (and empty that freelist)
> after upper layers in the network stack started a transmission on
> an active (pre-disconnect) TX queue.
>
> That problem is *NOT* related to any pending requests at all!!
Sorry, I misunderstood your comment. Can you please add the correct
comment yourself before we play some more rounds of ping pong ?
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
