Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 10:28 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
Yinghai Lu wrote:
No!
MMCONFIG will not work with acpi=off any more.
I don't think this is unreasonable. The ACPI MCFG table is how we are
supposed to learn about the area in the first place. If we can't get the
table location via an approved mechanism, and can't validate it doesn't
overlap with another memory reservation or something, I really don't
think we should be using it.
We all know how correct ACPI tables are. Specifications are nice,
reality tells a different story.
MMCONFIG can't be used without ACPI in any case unless we know where the
table is using chipset-specific knowledge (i.e. reading the registers
directly). Doing that without being told that this area is really
intended to be used, via the ACPI table, is dangerous, i.e. we don't
necessarily know if the MMCONFIG is broken on the platform in some way
we can't detect.
I don't think it's much of an issue anyway - the chances that somebody
will want to run without ACPI on a system with MCFG are pretty low given
that you'll end up losing a bunch of functionality (not least of which
is multi-cores).
acpi=off is an often used debug switch and it _is_ quite useful. Taking
away debug functionality is not a good idea.
If someone has to turn ACPI off, disabling MMCONFIG is probably the
least of their worries..
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from [email protected]
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
