Re: [PATCH] [19/50] Experimental: detect if SVM is disabled by BIOS

On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 12:32:18AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> Also allow to set svm lock.
> 
> TBD double check, documentation, i386 support
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

Could we have this patch tagged with x86 instead of "Experimental" in subject.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] [0/50] x86 2.6.24 patches review II
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] [19/50] Experimental: detect if SVM is disabled by BIOS
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] [9/50] i386: validate against ACPI motherboard resources
Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] Add CRC checksum for RCU lists
Previous by thread: [PATCH] [19/50] Experimental: detect if SVM is disabled by BIOS
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] [19/50] Experimental: detect if SVM is disabled by BIOS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]