Jose R. Santos wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:29:27 -0700
> Badari Pulavarty <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 09:06 -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
>>> From: Jose R. Santos <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> ext4: FLEX_BG Kernel support v2.
>>>
>>> @@ -702,13 +702,15 @@ static inline int ext4_valid_inum(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
>>> #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG 0x0010
>>> #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENTS 0x0040 /* extents support */
>>> #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT 0x0080
>>> +#define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FLEX_BG 0x0200
>> Any reason why 0x100 is skipped ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Badari
>>
>
> Because 0x0100 is reserved for EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MMP in e2fsprogs.
and we know that how? :) I'd at least put a comment into the kernel
code so it doesn't get taken, later.
-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
