Re: + oom-move-prototypes-to-appropriate-header-file.patch added to -mm tree

["Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>]

On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 12:38:03PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >
> > > > Move the OOM killer's extern function prototypes to include/linux/oom.h and
> > > > include it where necessary.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
> > > > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
> > >
> > > NAK. Target in corresponding Kbuild is wrong. sched.h is overkill.
> > > Could we please also drop extern's while in protos?
> > >
> >
> > I'll prevent including sched.h in a follow-up patchset that I'll be
> > posting soon (and you'll be Cc'd).  Which Kbuild target are you referring
> > to?
>
> It's header-y vs unifdef-y in include/linux/Kbuild. The former is
> for plain headers exported to userspace as-is. The latter need
> preprocessing to remove __KERNEL__, CONFIG_*, etc.

AFAIK, the only preprocessing that's removed is "__KERNEL__".

rday
-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/