Re: fpu IO port reservation (arch/i386)

>  For the curious the details of all the hassle are reasonably well 
> described in the Intel's AP-578 application note.

Thanks. Ok it has to stay for for i386 then; although it would be in theory
possible to only reserve when the CPU is a real 386. For x86-64 it's
gone now.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: fpu IO port reservation (arch/i386)
    • From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • fpu IO port reservation (arch/i386)
    • From: "Peter Fordham" <[email protected]>
  • Re: fpu IO port reservation (arch/i386)
    • From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]>
  • Re: fpu IO port reservation (arch/i386)
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: fpu IO port reservation (arch/i386)
    • From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: x86_64: potential critical issue with quicklists and page table pages
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 10/22] CacheFiles: Add a hook to write a single page of data to an inode
• Previous by thread: Re: fpu IO port reservation (arch/i386)
• Next by thread: Re: fpu IO port reservation (arch/i386)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]