Re: [Minor patch] Reduce __print_symbol/sprint_symbol stack usage.

On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 10:47 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 02:35:29PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > -		return sprintf(buffer, "%s+%#lx/%#lx", name, offset, size);
> > +	if (namebuf)
> > +		kfree(namebuf);
> 
> Note, the if condition is not needed, kfree handles null pointers fine.
> 
> -- Steve

Steve,

This patch has been scrapped and by another,  (hopefully) less
problematic one [1].

Thanks for the comments,
Gilboa

[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/21/180




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [Minor patch] Reduce __print_symbol/sprint_symbol stack usage.
    • From: Gilboa Davara <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Minor patch] Reduce __print_symbol/sprint_symbol stack usage.
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ppp_mppe: Don't put InterimKey on the stack
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 5/5] VFS: allow filesystem to override mknod capability checks
• Previous by thread: Re: [Minor patch] Reduce __print_symbol/sprint_symbol stack usage.
• Next by thread: [PATCH] ieee1394: nodemgr: fix leak of struct csr1212_keyval
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]