Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 20 September 2007 22:32, Frans Pop wrote:
>> On Thursday 20 September 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 20 September 2007 20:33, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>>>> Frans Pop wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday 20 September 2007, you wrote:
>>>>>> Please try this patch.
>>>>> Works. All states are now listed again.
>>>>> I've not tested suspend to disk, but suspend to ram and power off
>>>>> work fine.
>>>>>
>>>>>> +printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "(supports");
>> Note that this printk should be indented.
>>
>>>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
>>>>>> - printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "(supports");
>>>>>> for (i = ACPI_STATE_S0; i < ACPI_STATE_S4; i++) {
>>>>> Isn't there a risk now that we now end up printing
>>>>> ACPI: (supports)
>>>>> if CONFIG_SUSPEND is not enabled and >S4 is not supported?
>>>>>
>>>>> Or, more probably, it would print
>>>>> ACPI: (supports S5)
>>>> Don't know what does it mean to support S0 exactly... :)
>> Agreed, though arguably the same goes for S5. I guess you could say they are
>> all states that can be switched to.
>>
>>>>> as it is unlikely that "off" is not supported :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe S0 should be taken outside the #ifdef and the loop as that
>>>>> state is also basically always there?
>>>> Don't think it is worth the trouble. We already have this loop almost
>>>> completely unrolled, let's not make it complete mess...
>>> Well, you could use "(supports S0" instead of just "(supports". ;-)
>> After thinking about this a bit more, I think this does make sense for three
>> (admittedly minor) reasons:
>> - consistency between messages with and without CONFIG_SUSPEND
>> - consistency with /proc/acpi/sleep
>> - avoiding unnecessary change from previous versions.
>>
>> Please consider the attached patch which applies on top of Alexey's. Feel
>> free to integrate it in his patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <[email protected]>
>
> Alexey, do you agree?
Yes, was thinking to do it myself, but my ISP died this morning....
Regards,
Alex.
>
> (patch reproduced below for convenience).
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
> index 638172f..85633c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c
> @@ -401,9 +401,11 @@ int __init acpi_sleep_init(void)
> if (acpi_disabled)
> return 0;
>
> -printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "(supports");
> + sleep_states[ACPI_STATE_S0] = 1;
> + printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "(supports S0");
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_SUSPEND
> - for (i = ACPI_STATE_S0; i < ACPI_STATE_S4; i++) {
> + for (i = ACPI_STATE_S1; i < ACPI_STATE_S4; i++) {
> status = acpi_get_sleep_type_data(i, &type_a, &type_b);
> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> sleep_states[i] = 1;
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
