Re: [PATCH 0/1] x86: Reduce Memory Usage for large CPU count systems v2

On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:30:04 -0700 [email protected] wrote:

> Obviously, the IRQ arrays are of greater importance for
> size reduction.  Any suggestions, or threads I should read
> are gratefully accecpted... ;-)

hard.  Convert them to a radix-tree I suppose.  powerpc alrady does that
but it open-codes it in some fashion.  Don't look at it ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/1] x86: Reduce Memory Usage for large CPU count systems v2
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC][PATCH 0/2 -mm] kexec based hibernation -v3
• Next by Date: Problem: LTP linkat01 test fails on nfs directory (NFS v3)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86: Convert cpuinfo_x86 array to a per_cpu array v2
• Next by thread: [PATCH 2.6.23-rc6-mm1] - Panic in blk_rq_map_sg() from CCISS driver
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]