On Friday, 21 September 2007 00:05, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Linus,
>
> On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 14:55 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > And I think that's a damn reasonable thing to agree on: timers (and
> > anything else that CPU shutdown/bringup could *possibly* care about)
> > should be considered core enough that they had better be on the
> > suspend_late/resume_early list.
> >
> > Thomas, Rafael, can you verify that at least STR is ok in this respect?
>
> -ETOOTIRED led me too a wrong conclusion, but still it is a valuable
> hint that this change is making things work again.
Yes, it is.
> I need to go down into the details of the swsusp_suspend() code path to
> figure out, what's the root cause.
If you need any help from me with that, please let me know.
Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
