On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 10:25:56AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > Should we do comments for every single function argument, or is it OK to > leave them out for the obvious ones? Yes, we should keep the kerneldoc comments coherent, even if it seems useless in a few cases. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 00/24] Read-only bind mounts
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 01/24] filesystem helpers for custom 'struct file's
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 01/24] filesystem helpers for custom 'struct file's
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] docuement filesystem helpers for custom 'struct file's
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] docuement filesystem helpers for custom 'struct file's
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] docuement filesystem helpers for custom 'struct file's
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/24] Read-only bind mounts
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.23-rc6: S4 and S5 no longer listed as supported on Toshiba Satellite A40
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/6] lockdep: validate rcu_dereference() vs rcu_read_lock()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] docuement filesystem helpers for custom 'struct file's
- Next by thread: [PATCH 03/24] create cleanup helper svc_msnfs()
- Index(es):
 |