Hello,
First, I'm assuming that if I want my task to have the HIGHEST priority
in the system (i.e. preempt any other task whenever it is put into the
ready queue (assuming I have preemption turned on/configured)), I use
sched_setscheduler (...) and use the sched_priority in sched_param for
MAX_RT_PRIO -1. Is this correct?
Second, assuming that MAX_RT_PRIO-1 is the highest, would it be bad on
an SMP/Hyperthreading system (that's using the migration thread
balancing in 2.6.20.7) to set a task's priority to MAX_RT_PRIO -1 given
the fact that the migration threads are already set to MAX_RT_PRIO -1?
Should I be setting my task's prio to MAX_RT_PRIO-2 to not interfere
with the load balancing?
Thanks,
Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
