On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:44:18 +0100
Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:27:18AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > If we can't pull the entire series into -mm, can we just put the
> > first three patches for now? They can stand on their own.
>
> Yes, they're kinda a series of their own. But I still think we really
> want this in -mm. As we've seen on the kernel summit there's a pretty
> desparate need for it. And there's not many changes in this area in
> -mm, maybe the unprivilegued mounts. I'd personally prioritize the
> r/o bindmounts over them as they're more needed and we need more reviewing
> of the unprivilegued mounts (I'll try to come back to that soon).
What's the situation on unprivileged mounts? iirc, it's all a bit stuck.
If unpriv-mounts code isn't going to go into mainline ahead of r/o bind
mounts then it'd make a big mess to prepare the r/o bind mount patches on
top of unprivileged mounts.
It sounds like a better approach would be for me to merge the r/o bind
mounts code and to drop (or maybe rework) the unprivileged mounts patches
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]