Hi Ingo,
I found an issue about the scheduler.
If you need a test case, please let me know.
Here is a patch.
When using rt_mutex, a NULL pointer dereference is occurred at
enqueue_task_rt. Here is a scenario;
1) there are two threads, the thread A is fair_sched_class and
thread B is rt_sched_class.
2) Thread A is boosted up to rt_sched_class, because the thread A
has a rt_mutex lock and the thread B is waiting the lock.
3) At this time, when thread A create a new thread C, the thread
C has a rt_sched_class.
4) When doing wake_up_new_task() for the thread C, the priority
of the thread C is out of the RT priority range, because the
normal priority of thread A is not the RT priority. It makes
data corruption by overflowing the rt_prio_array.
The new thread C should be fair_sched_class.
The new thread should be valid scheduler class before queuing.
This patch fixes to set the suitable scheduler class.
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index deeb1f8..b0c582b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -1682,6 +1682,11 @@ void fastcall wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long clone_flags)
p->prio = effective_prio(p);
+ if (rt_prio(p->prio))
+ p->sched_class = &rt_sched_class;
+ else
+ p->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;
+
if (!p->sched_class->task_new || !sysctl_sched_child_runs_first ||
(clone_flags & CLONE_VM) || task_cpu(p) != this_cpu ||
!current->se.on_rq) {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
