Re: [patch 1/4] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code

On Wednesday 19 September 2007 14:53, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > [...]  Do you think I should also remove the __markers_strings
> > section from here ?
> 
> Current systemtap marker support code relies on the __markers_strings
> section.

Let users know that in comment above section definition in ld script.

Thanks!
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 1/4] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch 0/4] Linux Kernel Markers for 2.6.23-rc6-mm1
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/4] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
    • From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 1/4] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
    • From: [email protected] (Frank Ch. Eigler)

• Prev by Date: Re: bnx2 dirver's firmware images
• Next by Date: Re: X-freeze after clflush changes [Was: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1]
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 1/4] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 1/4] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent Code
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]