Hi Maks.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 07:18:41PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 10:12:38AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >
> > Could you give a concrete example?
> >
> > -hpa
>
> max@dual:~/src/klibc$ touch usr/utils/mount_main.c
> max@dual:~/src/klibc$ make
> KLIBCCC usr/utils/mount_main.o
> KLIBCLD usr/utils/static/halt
> LN usr/utils/static/reboot
> LN usr/utils/static/poweroff
> KLIBCLD usr/utils/shared/halt
> LN usr/utils/shared/reboot
> LN usr/utils/shared/poweroff
> KLIBCLD usr/utils/static/chroot
> KLIBCLD usr/utils/static/dd
> <snipp>
I do not recall the details at the moment but I recall I had to
do this tradeoff for some reasons.
I do not say it is not fixable but when I did the static-y support
I recall I took a shortcut or two under the assumption that everything
build by klibc was anyway so simple that compiling a bit too much was no harm.
Too buried with other stuff right now.
But feel free to poke me in roughly a month and I will take a deeper look.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]