On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 18:36 +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 01:56 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 07/09/2007, Kamalesh Babulal <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: kernel BUG at fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c:945!
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1]
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: SMP NR_CPUS=128 NUMA pSeries
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: Modules linked in: nfs lockd nfs_acl
> >>> sunrpc ipv6 loop dm_mod ibmveth sg ibmvscsic sd_mod scsi_mod
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: NIP: d000000000378044 LR:
> >>> d000000000378034 CTR: 80000000001c5840
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: REGS: c0000000d971b050 TRAP: 0700 Not
> >>> tainted (2.6.23-rc5-ppc64)
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: MSR: 8000000000029032 <EE,ME,IR,DR> CR:
> >>> 28000444 XER: 00000014
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: TASK = c000000002787740[11508] 'fsstress'
> >>> THREAD: c0000000d9718000 CPU: 1
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: GPR00: 0000000000000001 c0000000d971b2d0
> >>> d0000000003bd648 0000000000000037
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: GPR04: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> >>> 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: GPR08: 0000000000000002 c000000000616538
> >>> c0000000ef7afb58 c000000000616540
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: GPR12: 0000000000004000 c0000000005e4a80
> >>> 0000000000000000 00000000200b2510
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: GPR16: 0000000020105550 00000000200b2534
> >>> 000000002008c15c 0000000000000001
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000001
> >>> fffffffffffff000 c0000000d971ba30
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: GPR24: d00000000034f524 c0000000dc4f8054
> >>> c0000000d971b7d0 c0000000d9d313f0
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: GPR28: 0000000000000276 0000000022000000
> >>> d0000000003b8d78 0000000000000000
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: NIP [d000000000378044]
> >>> .encode_lookup+0x6c/0xbc [nfs]
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: LR [d000000000378034]
> >>> .encode_lookup+0x5c/0xbc [nfs]
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: Call Trace:
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: [c0000000d971b2d0] [d000000000378034]
> >>> .encode_lookup+0x5c/0xbc [nfs] (unreliable)
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: [c0000000d971b370] [d000000000379f8c]
> >>> .nfs4_xdr_enc_lookup+0x78/0xbc [nfs]
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: [c0000000d971b440] [d000000000314534]
> >>> .rpcauth_wrap_req+0xe4/0x124 [sunrpc]
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: [c0000000d971b4f0] [d00000000030a790]
> >>> .call_transmit+0x218/0x2b8 [sunrpc]
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: [c0000000d971b590] [d0000000003124d8]
> >>> .__rpc_execute+0xd4/0x368 [sunrpc]
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: [c0000000d971b630] [d00000000030b114]
> >>> .rpc_do_run_task+0xc8/0x104 [sunrpc]
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: [c0000000d971b6e0] [d00000000030b224]
> >>> .rpc_call_sync+0x2c/0x64 [sunrpc]
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: [c0000000d971b760] [d00000000036ef04]
> >>> ._nfs4_proc_lookupfh+0xd4/0x124 [nfs]
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: [c0000000d971b850] [d0000000003719a0]
> >>> ._nfs4_proc_lookup+0x80/0x21c [nfs]
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: [c0000000d971b910] [d000000000371ba4]
> >>> .nfs4_proc_lookup+0x68/0xac [nfs]
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: [c0000000d971b9c0] [d000000000354bf4]
> >>> .nfs_lookup+0x158/0x334 [nfs]
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: [c0000000d971bbc0] [c0000000000f3a28]
> >>> .lookup_hash+0xfc/0x140
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: [c0000000d971bc60] [c0000000000f7b28]
> >>> .sys_renameat+0x164/0x228
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: [c0000000d971be30] [c000000000008534]
> >>> syscall_exit+0x0/0x40
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: Instruction dump:
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: e8410028 7fa4eb78 7c7f1b79 7fb80026
> >>> 40820014 e8be83a8 e87e8350 4800c5f9
> >>> Sep 7 11:42:49 p55lp2 kernel: e8410028 7fb80120 7c180026 54001ffe
> >>> <0b000000> 3800000f 7b850020 387f0008
> >>>
> >> Is this a post 2.6.22 regression? Have you tried 2.6.23-rc5-git1?
> >> (There are a few nfs fixes)
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Michal
> >>
> >
> > It looks like a bug that has been there at least since 2.6.18. Could you
> > see if this fixes it?
> >
> > Trond
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Subject:
> > No Subject
> > From:
> > Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
> > Date:
> > Sun, 9 Sep 2007 00:10:51 +0200
> >
> >
> > It doesn't look as if the NFSv4 name length is being initialised correctly
> > in the struct nfs_server. We need to limit any entry there to
> > NFS4_MAXNAMLEN.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > fs/nfs/client.c | 3 +++
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/client.c b/fs/nfs/client.c
> > index a49f9fe..54068fb 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/client.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/client.c
> > @@ -928,6 +928,9 @@ static int nfs4_init_server(struct nfs_server *server,
> >
> > error = nfs_init_server_rpcclient(server, authflavour);
> >
> > + if (server->namelen == 0 || server->namelen > NFS4_MAXNAMLEN)
> > + server->namelen = NFS4_MAXNAMLEN;
> > +
> > /* Done */
> > dprintk("<-- nfs4_init_server() = %d\n", error);
> > return error;
> >
> Hi Trond,
>
> After applying the patch, i get the same kernel Bug
>
> cpu 0x0: Vector: 700 (Program Check) at [c0000000e2d5f050]
> pc: d000000000841668: .encode_lookup+0x6c/0xbc [nfs]
> lr: d000000000841658: .encode_lookup+0x5c/0xbc [nfs]
> sp: c0000000e2d5f2d0
> msr: 8000000000029032
> current = 0xc0000000e6358790
> paca = 0xc0000000005ead00
> pid = 3452, comm = fsstress
> kernel BUG at fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c:945!
> enter ? for help
> [c0000000e2d5f370] d0000000008435b0 .nfs4_xdr_enc_lookup+0x78/0xbc [nfs]
> [c0000000e2d5f440] d00000000019a2d4 .rpcauth_wrap_req+0xe4/0x124 [sunrpc]
> [c0000000e2d5f4f0] d000000000190774 .call_transmit+0x218/0x2b8 [sunrpc]
> [c0000000e2d5f590] d000000000198308 .__rpc_execute+0xd4/0x34c [sunrpc]
> [c0000000e2d5f630] d0000000001910f8 .rpc_do_run_task+0xc8/0x104 [sunrpc]
> [c0000000e2d5f6e0] d000000000191208 .rpc_call_sync+0x2c/0x64 [sunrpc]
> [c0000000e2d5f760] d0000000008386f0 ._nfs4_proc_lookupfh+0xd4/0x124 [nfs]
> [c0000000e2d5f850] d00000000083b14c ._nfs4_proc_lookup+0x80/0x21c [nfs]
> [c0000000e2d5f910] d00000000083b350 .nfs4_proc_lookup+0x68/0xac [nfs]
> [c0000000e2d5f9c0] d00000000081ea40 .nfs_lookup+0x158/0x314 [nfs]
> [c0000000e2d5fbc0] c0000000000f4ba8 .lookup_hash+0xfc/0x140
> [c0000000e2d5fc60] c0000000000f8a70 .sys_renameat+0x164/0x228
> [c0000000e2d5fe30] c000000000008534 syscall_exit+0x0/0x40
> --- Exception: c01 (System Call) at 000000000feeb3d4
> SP (ffe805a0) is in userspace
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Kamalesh Babulal.
I'm mystified. I'm quite unable to reproduce this on my own setup: the
ENAMETOOLONG error reporting mechanism prevents me from even getting
near the above bug.
Could you add a little printk into the 'encode_lookup' routine on line
944 of fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c to display the value of 'len'?
Cheers
Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
