Re: [PATCH] x86: also show non-zero IRQ counts for vectors that currently don't have a handler

On Wednesday 19 September 2007 16:41:57 Jan Beulich wrote:
> It doesn't seem to make sense to hide these, even if their counts
> can't change at the point in time they're being displayed.

Applied thanks

I hope irqbalanced can handle that, but we'll find out.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] x86: also show non-zero IRQ counts for vectors that currently don't have a handler
  - From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] i386/PAE: avoid temporarily inconsistent pte-s
Next by Date: Re: follow-up: discrepancy with POSIX
Previous by thread: [PATCH] x86: also show non-zero IRQ counts for vectors that currently don't have a handler
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/2] strip generated symbols from *.ko
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]