Re: bnx2 dirver's firmware images

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Miller wrote:
From: "Michael Chan" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:05:51 -0700

The bnx2 firmware changes quite frequently.  A new driver quite often
requires new firmware to work correctly.  Splitting them up makes things
difficult for the user.

The firmware in tg3 is a lot more mature and I don't expect it to
change.  I think tg3 is better suited for using request_firmware().

Like I said, I think neither should change and the driver should
be fully functional when built statically into the kernel.

Is that a suggestion that the driver work differently when built as a module or built in? I've seen that behavior many time over the years, but it usually not deliberate. ;-)

--
Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux