On Wednesday 19 September 2007 Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 07:55:13PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Sounds to me like a known issue by you. Can you give a few more details
> > so we maybe can get it fixed?
> I believe what happened here is an x86_64 build followed by a
> UML/x86_64 build with no intervening mrproper.
Yes, after a "make mrproper" it compiles fine.
However, the .config is gone afterwards ...
> I've always considered this to be a "don't do that" sort of thing.
> However, maybe we could stick the arch of the current build somewhere
> in the tree, check that before any serious part of a subsequent
> build, and error out if $ARCH is different.
Well, on this line it may be nice to be able to put the target architecture
somewhere ...
make mrproper
make menuconfig ARCH=um
make ARCH=um
... some tweaking
make menuconfig
and the .config is overwritten with the "wrong" architecture.
(I know about .config.bak and so on ... just a small wish)
Thank you!
Regards,
Phil
--
Versioning your /etc, /home or even your whole installation?
Try fsvs (fsvs.tigris.org)!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]