Re: CFS: some bad numbers with Java/database threading [FIXED]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/14/2007 11:32 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Antoine Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>>> have an impact) Keep CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y to be able to twiddle the
>>>> sysctl.
>> It looks good now! Updated results here:
>> http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/Linux-Kernels/Kernels-ManyThreads-CombinedTests5-10msYield-noload.png
>> http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/Linux-Kernels/Kernels-ManyThreads-CombinedTests5-10msYield.png
>> Compared with more kernels here - a bit more cluttered:
>> http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/Linux-Kernels/Kernels-ManyThreads-CombinedTests4-10msYield-noload.png
>>
>> Thanks Ingo!
>> Does this mean that I'll have to keep doing:
>> echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_yield_bug_workaround
>> Or are you planning on finding a more elegant solution?
> 
> just to make sure - can you get it to work fast with the 
> -rc6+yield-patch solution too? (i.e. not CFS-devel) We need a (tested) 
> solution for 2.6.23 and the CFS-devel patches are not for 2.6.23. I've 
> attached below the latest version of the -rc6 yield patch - the switch 
> is not dependent on SCHED_DEBUG anymore but always available.
> 

Is this going to be merged? And will you be making the default == 1 or
just leaving it at 0, which forces people who want the older behavior to
modify the default?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux