Re: [patch 07/11] Text Edit Lock - kprobes architecture independent support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 02:40:38PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Use the mutual exclusion provided by the text edit lock in the kprobes code. It
> allows coherent manipulation of the kernel code by other subsystems.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <[email protected]>

> CC: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
> CC: [email protected]
> ---
>  kernel/kprobes.c |   19 +++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/kprobes.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/kernel/kprobes.c	2007-09-07 10:12:06.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/kprobes.c	2007-09-07 10:13:09.000000000 -0400
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
>  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
>  #include <linux/debugfs.h>
>  #include <linux/kdebug.h>
> +#include <linux/memory.h>
> 
>  #include <asm-generic/sections.h>
>  #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> @@ -568,9 +569,10 @@ static int __kprobes __register_kprobe(s
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> 
> +	kernel_text_lock();
>  	ret = arch_prepare_kprobe(p);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto out;
> +		goto out_unlock_text;
> 
>  	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&p->hlist);
>  	hlist_add_head_rcu(&p->hlist,
> @@ -578,7 +580,8 @@ static int __kprobes __register_kprobe(s
> 
>  	if (kprobe_enabled)
>  		arch_arm_kprobe(p);
> -
> +out_unlock_text:
> +	kernel_text_unlock();
>  out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
> 
> @@ -621,8 +624,11 @@ valid_p:
>  		 * enabled - otherwise, the breakpoint would already have
>  		 * been removed. We save on flushing icache.
>  		 */
> -		if (kprobe_enabled)
> +		if (kprobe_enabled) {
> +			kernel_text_lock();
>  			arch_disarm_kprobe(p);
> +			kernel_text_unlock();
> +		}
>  		hlist_del_rcu(&old_p->hlist);
>  		cleanup_p = 1;
>  	} else {
> @@ -644,9 +650,7 @@ valid_p:
>  			list_del_rcu(&p->list);
>  			kfree(old_p);
>  		}
> -		mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex);
>  		arch_remove_kprobe(p);
> -		mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
>  	} else {
>  		mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex);
>  		if (p->break_handler)
> @@ -717,7 +721,6 @@ static int __kprobes pre_handler_kretpro
>  		ri->rp = rp;
>  		ri->task = current;
>  		arch_prepare_kretprobe(ri, regs);
> -
>  		/* XXX(hch): why is there no hlist_move_head? */
>  		hlist_del(&ri->uflist);
>  		hlist_add_head(&ri->uflist, &ri->rp->used_instances);
> @@ -940,8 +943,10 @@ static void __kprobes enable_all_kprobes
> 
>  	for (i = 0; i < KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE; i++) {
>  		head = &kprobe_table[i];
> +		kernel_text_lock();
>  		hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(p, node, head, hlist)
>  			arch_arm_kprobe(p);
> +		kernel_text_unlock();
>  	}
> 
>  	kprobe_enabled = true;
> @@ -969,10 +974,12 @@ static void __kprobes disable_all_kprobe
>  	printk(KERN_INFO "Kprobes globally disabled\n");
>  	for (i = 0; i < KPROBE_TABLE_SIZE; i++) {
>  		head = &kprobe_table[i];
> +		kernel_text_lock();
>  		hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(p, node, head, hlist) {
>  			if (!arch_trampoline_kprobe(p))
>  				arch_disarm_kprobe(p);
>  		}
> +		kernel_text_unlock();
>  	}
> 
>  	mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex);
> 
> -- 
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
> OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux