On Sep 18, 2007, at 7:16 AM, Bodo Eggert wrote:
Paul de Weerd <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 03:38:45PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
| It's not about lazyness of BSD developers, many people who
consider the
| BSD licence more free than the GPL argue that the advantage of
the BSD
| licence is that it does not require you to give back.
|
| Something is wrong if your licence text clearly states that you
do not
| require getting anything back but you then argue on moral
grounds that
| something has to be given back.
Something is wrong if your licence text clearly states that you MUST
give back, but then you don't return the favour on grounds that "hey,
they don't require it, so we don't have to".
If you may demand me to give back, why should I(*) not demand the
same thing
for my contributions?
You're not only asking to contribute to your project, but you're
asking me
to throw my code to the feet of Apple amd Microsoft, who will user
it, make
big bucks and lock out alternatives as far as possible, especially
free ones.
This happens to not be my idea of sharing code.
Here we go again with the "Evil Corporation". What exactly have they
"lock[ed] out"? How have they magically stopped you from
distributing your "free" code?
Are you somehow able to make "big bucks" on your own with the GPL
that you wouldn't have otherwise been able to under the BSD? If so,
please let me know. I want big bucks too!
---
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
