Re: [2.6.22.6] nfsd: fh_verify() `malloc failure' with lots of free memory leads to NFS hang

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:54:07AM +0100, Nix wrote:
> The code which calls new_do_write() looks like this:
> 
> ,----[ libio/fileops.c:_IO_new_file_xsputn() ]
> |  if (do_write)
> |    {
> |      count = new_do_write (f, s, do_write);
> |      to_do -= count;
> |      if (count < do_write)
> |        return n - to_do;
> |    }
> `----
> 
> This code handles partial writes followed by errors by returning a
> suitable nonzero value, and immediate errors by returning -1.
> 
> In either case the buffer will have been filled as much as possible by
> that point, and will still be filled when (vf)printf() is next called.

OK, I'm a little lost at this point (what's n?  What's to_do?), but I'll
take your word for it.

I'd be kinda curious when exactly the behavior changed and why.

Also I suppose we should check which version of nfs-utils that fix is in
and make sure distributions are getting the fixed nfs-utils before they
get the new libc, or we're going to see this bug a lot....

> This behaviour is, IIRC, mandated by the C Standard: I can find no
> reference in the Standard to streams being flushed on error, only
> on fclose(), fflush(), or program termination.

OK!

Let me know if the problem's fixed.

--b.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux