If we depend on the inodes for writeability, we will not
catch the r/o mounts when implemented.
This patches uses __mnt_want_write(). It does not guarantee
that the mount will stay writeable after the check. But,
this is OK for one of the checks because it is just for a
printk().
The other two are probably unnecessary and duplicate existing
checks in the VFS. This won't make them better checks than
before, but it will make them detect r/o mounts.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
---
lxc-dave/fs/nfs/dir.c | 3 ++-
lxc-dave/fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/nfs/dir.c~nfs-check-mnt-instead-of-sb fs/nfs/dir.c
--- lxc/fs/nfs/dir.c~nfs-check-mnt-instead-of-sb 2007-09-17 09:44:05.000000000 -0700
+++ lxc-dave/fs/nfs/dir.c 2007-09-17 09:44:05.000000000 -0700
@@ -997,7 +997,8 @@ static int is_atomic_open(struct inode *
if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_DIRECTORY)
return 0;
/* Are we trying to write to a read only partition? */
- if (IS_RDONLY(dir) && (nd->intent.open.flags & (O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|FMODE_WRITE)))
+ if (__mnt_is_readonly(nd->mnt) &&
+ (nd->intent.open.flags & (O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|FMODE_WRITE)))
return 0;
return 1;
}
diff -puN fs/nfsd/vfs.c~nfs-check-mnt-instead-of-sb fs/nfsd/vfs.c
--- lxc/fs/nfsd/vfs.c~nfs-check-mnt-instead-of-sb 2007-09-17 09:44:05.000000000 -0700
+++ lxc-dave/fs/nfsd/vfs.c 2007-09-17 09:44:05.000000000 -0700
@@ -1853,7 +1853,7 @@ nfsd_permission(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
inode->i_mode,
IS_IMMUTABLE(inode)? " immut" : "",
IS_APPEND(inode)? " append" : "",
- IS_RDONLY(inode)? " ro" : "");
+ __mnt_is_readonly(exp->ex_mnt)? " ro" : "");
dprintk(" owner %d/%d user %d/%d\n",
inode->i_uid, inode->i_gid, current->fsuid, current->fsgid);
#endif
@@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@ nfsd_permission(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
*/
if (!(acc & MAY_LOCAL_ACCESS))
if (acc & (MAY_WRITE | MAY_SATTR | MAY_TRUNC)) {
- if (exp_rdonly(rqstp, exp) || IS_RDONLY(inode))
+ if (exp_rdonly(rqstp, exp) || __mnt_is_readonly(exp->ex_mnt))
return nfserr_rofs;
if (/* (acc & MAY_WRITE) && */ IS_IMMUTABLE(inode))
return nfserr_perm;
_
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
