On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 11:30:11AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * [email protected] <[email protected]> [2007-09-17 02:29]:
> > you claim that it's unethical for the linux community to use the code, but
> > brag about NetApp useing the code. what makes NetApp ok and Linux evil?
>
> NetApp does not pretend to be free and open and save the world etc
GPL and BSD are two different philosophies of freedom.
Some people (e.g. me) consider the BSD licence a less free licence
since it doesn't defend that the code stays free.
Some people consider the BSD licence more free since NetApp or Linux or
Microsoft can take your code and never gove back.
Although I don't agree with it, I can understand the rationale of the
latter.
But stating in your licence that noone has to give back but then
complaining to some people on ethical grounds that they should give
back is simply dishonest.
Is your intention to allow people to include your code into GPL'ed code
and never give back, or is your intention that this shouldn't happen?
And whatever your intention is should be stated in your licence.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
