Re: RFC: incorrect results from RTC reading method

On Thursday 13 September 2007, Bob Montgomery wrote:

> I think any method for reading the RTC must consider the (Update In
> Progress) flag to avoid bogus results.

This is a really good idea, I wonder if this has been tried before...
But seriously, the RTC driver does that, and the boot process used to do that, 
too.

	Torsten
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • RFC: incorrect results from RTC reading method
    • From: Bob Montgomery <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86: constify stacktrace_ops
• Next by Date: [PATCH -rc] KVM: Fix virtualization menu help text
• Previous by thread: RFC: incorrect results from RTC reading method
• Next by thread: [PATCH 0/3] UML - Three small patches for 2.6.24
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]